The Corrupt Beliefs of the
Qadiani Sect
Qadiani refer to those who follow
Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani. Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadiani is the founder of this
sect. He claimed to be a Prophet and uttered blasphemy against the
Ambia-e-Kiraam علیہم السلام,
particularly against Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام and
his respected, chaste, pure and truthful mother, Bibi Maryam. He has made such
insolent statements against Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام and Bibi Maryam that listening to it will
cause the heart of the Muslims to shudder.
However, the current alarming condition
has made it necessary and thereby compelled me quote his blasphemous words.
Just the claim of Prophethood by is itself kufr and sufficient to have one cast
into hell for all eternity, as it is to entirely oppose the Holy Qur’an and to reject
the Finality of Khaatamun Nabiyeen صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم, yet he did not stop at this but instead
he continued to make derogatory statements against other Prophets of Allah.
Thereby burdening himself with the curse of being a blasphemy, which consisted
of hundreds of kufr.
The Shariah declares that the
‘Tauheen’ (insult) to any Nabi is confirmed kufr, even if the blasphemer
acknowledges all the other Prophets and the other Essential Fundamental
Principles of Deen. To reject the words of any one Nabi is to reject the words
of all the Nabis. Hence, the Holy Qur’an declares:
(کَذَّبَتْ قَوْمُ
نُوۡحِۣ الْمُرْسَلِیۡنَ ﴿۱۰۵﴾ )
’The nation of Nuh, rejected the Prophets’ [Surah 26, Verse 105]
Not only did Mirza Ghulam Ahmed falsify
and reject the word of one Prophet but also he claimed to be more superior to a
Prophet. There is no doubt in such a person and his followers being kaafir.
Anyone who doubts their kufr will himself become a kaafir. Some of the kufr statements
made by him are as follows:
(1). He says that, ‘In the Barahine
Ahmadiya, Allah has described this humble servant as Ummati and also as Nabi’.
[Izala’e-Awham pg 533]
(2). He claims that Allah has said,
‘O Ahmed your name will appear even before my name’. [Anjaam Aatham pg 52]
(3). He claims that Allah has said,
‘O Ahmed! Glad tidings, you are my desire and you are with me’. [Anjaam Aatham
pg 55]
(4). The evil Qadiani also attributed
to himself, verses which are revealed in regards to the beloved Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم.
(وَمَاۤ اَرْسَلْنٰکَ اِلَّا رَحْمَۃً
لِّلْعٰلَمِیۡنَ ﴿۱۰۷﴾ )
“And We sent you not, but as Mercy
unto the all the worlds”
[Surah 21, Verse 107]
(وَ مُبَشِّرًۢا بِرَسُوۡلٍ یَّاۡتِیۡ مِنۡۢ
بَعْدِی اسْمُہٗۤ اَحْمَدُ ؕ)
“And giving glad tidings of that Prophet
who will appear after me. His name is Ahmad” [Surah 61, Verse 6]
He claimed that the above verses of
the Holy Qur’an are referring to him. (Allah Forbid) [Anjaam Aatham pg 78]
(5). The cursed Ghulam Ahmed falsely
claims that Allah says:
(أَنْتَ مِنِّيْ
بِمَنْزِلَۃِ أَوْلاَدِيْ أَنْتَ مِنِّي وَأنَا مِنْکَ).
O Ghulam Ahmed, you are like my offspring and I am from
you and you are from me [Daafi’ul
Bala, pg 6]
(6). He says, “The Prophet’s صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم Ilhaam
(Divine Inspiration) and Wahi (Divine Revelation) proved to be false.”
[Izala’e-Awham pg 688]
(7). He claims that ‘Hazrat Musa’s علیہ السلام
predictions did not come true as he
had wished and expected them to.’ [Izala’e-Awham]. His aim of saying this was
to try and demonstrate that most of the predictions of Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام
were even more unsuccessful.
(8). He claims that the verse in
Surah Baqara which mentions the incident of the dead person who was brought
back to life after being struck with a piece of beef, was only used by Hazrat
Musa علیہ السلام
to create unnecessary fear (i.e. a
threat) and it was actually a form of mesmerism. [Izala’e Awham pg 775]
(9). He claims that the incident in
the Qur’an relating to the miracle of Hazrat Ibrahim علیہ
السلام and the 4 birds is also an outcome of mesmerism.
[Izala’e-Awham pg 553]
(10). He says, “in the time of a
certain King, 400 Prophets predicted his victory but they were all wrong as he
lost the battle and thus died on that battlefield.” [Izala’e-Awham pg 629]
(11). He says, “The Qur’an consists
of vulgar and abusive language and its tone is very harsh.:” [Izala’e-Awham pg
26-28]
(12). He claims that his, ‘Barahine Ahmadiya’
is the book of Allah. [Izala’e-Awham pg 533]
(13). He says, Neither Esa علیہ السلام
nor Musa علیہ
السلام were true and perfect guides. [Arba’een vol. 2 pg 13]
Let us now examine some of the blasphemous
statements he uttered in particular against Hazrat Esa علیہ
السلام:
(1). ‘O Christian missionaries. Do
not say that ربّنا المسیح
‘Esa علیہ السلام
(Jesus) is our Lord, for there is
one amongst you (referring to himself) who is greater than Esa.’ [Me’yaar pg
13]
(2). ‘Almighty Allah has sent in the
present Ummah a Messiah who supersedes the past Messiah on glory and grace and
named him Ghulam-e-Ahmed. This is to suggest that the Messiah of the Christians
is inferior in status and cannot even compare to a slave of Ahmad, so far as
his ability to intercede and access to Allah is concerned.’ [Me’yaar, pg 13/14]
(3). ‘The example of Musa is better
than Musa himself and the example of the son of Maryam is better than the son
of Maryam himself.’ [Kashti pg 13] (4). ‘Allah has informed me that the
‘Masih-e-Muhammadi’ is more exalted than the ‘Masih-e-Musawi’.’ [Kashti pg 20]
(5). ‘Almighty Allah says that He
will create an equal to the Messiah, who will not only be equal, but who will
supersede him in every way. This will be Ghulam Ahmed.’
He says:
ابنِ مریم کے
ذکر کو چھوڑو
اُس سے بہتر
غلام احمد ہے
‘Abandon the remembrance of the son of Maryam.
Better than him is Ghulam Ahmad’
‘That which has been mentioned above
is not merely a poetic stanza but it is the fact. It is my experience that the
support of Allah is more with me than with the son of Maryam. If this does not
prove to be true then I am a liar.’ [Daafi’ul ul Bala pg 20]
(7). ‘As per his covenant, Allah has
power over everything but he cannot bring back to earth a person who has
already caused enough destruction.’ [Daafi’ul ul Bala pg 15]
(8). ‘Maryam’s son is in no way
better than Kaushalya’s son (the Hindus Ram).’ [Anjaam Aatham pg 41]
(9). ‘I swear by him in whose
control is my life, that if Esa the son of Maryam were in my time, then he
would not have been able to converse in the way that I do, and he would
definitely not have been able to demonstrate the signs which I show.’
[Kashti-e-Nuh pg 56]
(10). He says, ‘The Jews have such
strong objections against the Nabuiwat of Esa علیہ السلام and
there is not much that even I can say to clarify it. The only thing that I can
say is that he is a Prophet, because the Qur’an says that he is a Prophet. With
the exception of this, there is no other Proof of his Nabuiwat. Rather, there
are numerous proofs which can be used to differ his Nabuiwat.’ [Ijaz’e Ahmadi
pg 13]
Important Note: It must be noted that in the abovementioned statement,
Mirza has supported the corrupt theory of the Jews and at the same time claiming
that the Qur’an preaches that which can be nullified by way of evidence and
argument. (Allah Forbid)
(11). He says, ‘The Christian claim
that he is God, whereas in actual fact, even his Nabuiwat cannot be confirmed’.
[Ijaz’e Ahmadi pg 14]
(12). ‘Sometimes Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام
used to have shaitaani inspirations
as well.’ [Ijaz’e Ahmadi pg 14]
O Muslims! Are you aware of those that
receive shaitaani inspirations? The Holy Qur’an announces:
(تَنَزَّلُ عَلٰی کُلِّ اَفَّاکٍ اَثِیۡمٍ
﴿۲۲۲﴾ )
“They come down upon every extremely
deceitful, rebellious sinner.”[1]
[Surah 26, Verse 222]
(13). He says, ‘Most of his (Esa علیہ السلام) predictions
and prophecies were incorrect.’ [Ijaz’e Ahmadi pg 14]
(14). He says, ‘I must regretfully
admit that the accusations of the Jews against him are so convincing that I too
am unable to defend him (Esa علیہ السلام).’ [Ijaz’e Ahmadi pg 13]
(15). He says, ‘O where shall I go
to lament, that 3 of his (Esa علیہ السلام) prophecies were proven to be completely
incorrect.’ [Ijaz’e Ahmadi pg 13]
The above mentioned statement completely
rejects the Prophethood of Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام.
(16). He contradicts himself by saying,
‘It is impossible for the prophecies of the Prophets to be halted.’
[Kashti-e-Nuh pg 5]
(17). ‘I fully accept that the
Messiah (Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام)
was a very pious personality in comparison to others in his era. I cannot
however accept him as being a true ‘Munji’ (liberated person), for he was not born
in Arabia.’ [Daafi’ul Bala pg 3]
(18). ‘What I said earlier about Esa
علیہ السلام
was only out of gentleness and kindness,
otherwise the possibility exists of there being many pious people in his era
who were far more superior to him.’ [Daafi’ul Bala pg 3]
(19). He says, ‘The Messiahs piety
was in no way better than the piety of other righteous ones in his era. When
compared to Esa, Yahya appears to be more pious because he never consumed any wine
in his lifetime, nor did any immoral woman ever touch Yahya in orderto apply
perfume to his head, which she had purchased through her illegitimate earnings,
or touched his body with her hand or hair. Unlike Esa, Yahya was never served
by any young female who was not related to him. This is why in the Holy Qur’an
Allah has referred to Yahya as ‘Husoor’ and he did not use such a name for Esa
because such incidents disallow him from being afforded such a name.’ [Daafi’ul
Bala pg 4]
(20). He says, ‘He had a very close
relationship to a tribe of drifters. This was probably because of his ancestral
relationship to that tribe. Otherwise, there was no other reason for a pious
man like him to permit a young gypsy female to apply perfume purchased from her
illegitimate earnings of adultery, to his head with her impure hands and to rub
her hair against his legs. Understanding people will realise from this, what
kind of a person this was.’
The above mentioned are only some of
the derogatory statements of Mirza. He has used many other derogatory and
vulgar words with regards to Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام. He referred to him as being malicious, shrewd
and vulgar. He also referred to him as a liar, a thief, a cheat and dim-witted
etc. In his attempt to discredit Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام he
did not leave any stone unturned. He writes sarcastically, ‘Even his larger
family are very pure and chaste. 3 of his paternal grandmothers and 3 of his
maternal grandmothers were adulteresses and of bad character from whose blood
he was born.’
It must be noted that here Mirza
says paternal grandmothers, whereas Esa علیہ السلام was
born without a father. In this statement, he is rejecting the word of the Holy
Qur’an that Esa علیہ السلام
was born without a father.
He further states that Esa علیہ السلام
had 4 brothers and 2 sisters and all
of them were his own blood brothers and sisters. He said (Allah Forbid) that
they were children of Hazrat Yusuf علیہ السلام and
Bibi Maryam. Like all his other corrupt beliefs, this too is no less corrupt.
He also claimed in his book Anjaam
Atham that Esa علیہ السلام
did not have the ability to perform
any miracles. He says in the same book that in those days there was a pond which
had miraculous powers and all miracles that occurred at the time, were related
to this (so-called) pond. He further says that the only power Esa علیہ السلام
had was that of deceiving the people
(Allah Forbid). He further states in Izala’e Awham that the miracles performed
by Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام
are only misconceptions and if one
leaves out the tales that are usually mentioned as miracles, then one will find
that all his miracles were not true and that no miracle performed by any other
Prophet is doubted as much as those performed by him.
He also again attempts to prove that
all the miracles of Esa علیہ السلام
were due to the magical pond. How
many other corrupt beliefs and statements of the daj’jaal Qadiani can we
present to you, whereas there are so many more. Those who are true Muslims can
clearly see how this accursed person has attacked the station of such an
exalted Prophet, who has been given such great excellence in the Holy Qur’an. I
am amazed at those unsuspecting people who are falling prey to his deceit and
are blindly following him, still regarding him as being a Muslim.
I am even more astonished by those
who claim to be intellectuals, yet they are blindly following him into the
crater of hell. Can any true Muslim ever doubt that such a person is out of the
fold of Islam, and a kaafir and murtad (apostate)? By Allah! Never!
The ruling of the Shariah regarding
such a person and the one who after knowing his infidelity still regards him a
Muslim is:
''مَنْ شَکَّ فيْ
عَذَابِہ وَکُفْرِہ فَقَدْ کَفَرَ.''
‘The one who doubts the punishment or infidelity of such
a person, will himself become a infidel’
[1]
The above mentioned verse of the Qur’an makes it very clear
that shaitaani (devilish and evil) inspirations only appear to evil persons and
open sinners. The accursed Ghulam Ahmad has unsuccessfully attempted to prove
this for Esa علیہ السلام.
0 comments:
Post a Comment