Their Corrupt Beliefs Unveiled
1. It is on pages 35 and 36 of Izaa
ul Haq (published by Farooqi Publications) ‘It is an evil innovation to say
that Allah is free from time, space and place, and having faith in the reality
of seeing him directly (i.e. being blessed with His Divine Vision). One who
holds such a belief is a sinner and an innovator.’ The author of this book says
that to believe that Allah is free from place, time or space is wrong and we
the Ahle Sunnat believe that Allah is free from time, place or space. In this
statement, the author has branded the entire Ahle Sunnat and its leaders as
Bid’atis (innovators) and sinners. It is in Bahrur Ra’iq, Durr-e-Mukhtar and
Fatawa Alamgiri that any person who considers a place for Allah (i.e. confines
Allah to limits of time or place) is a kaafir.
2. On page 60 of Taqwiyatul Imaan,
he quotes this Hadith:
(أَرأَیْتَ لَوْ مَرَرْتَ بِقَبْرِيْ أَ
کُنْتَ تَسْجُدُ لَہٗ.)
Then translates it in the following words,
‘Think, whether you will prostrate before my grave when you pass by it.’ After
this, he puts a note and then adds to it the following words, ‘One day I too
will die and be mixed with the sand’. He added the above mentioned statement
falsely, whereas the Prophet
صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
himself says:
(إِنَّ اللہَ حَرَّمَ عَلَی الْأَرْضِ أنْ
تَأْکُلَ أجْسَادَ الأَنْبِیَاءِ.)
‘Allah has made it Haraam upon the
earth, that it may devour the bodies of the Prophets.’
(فَنَبِيُّ اللہِ حَيٌّ
یُّرْزَقُ.)
‘So, the Prophets of Allah are alive and they are given
sustenance’
3. It is as follows on page 19 of
Taqwiyatul Imaan, ‘Since Almighty Allah alone is our Creator, we should only
ask him for help in all our affairs, just as a man after becoming a servant of
a King only turns to him and not to another King, What then has to be said
about (taking help from) any ‘chamar’ (low cast person).’ Can any person who
claims to be a Muslim use such a derogatory term towards the Ambia-e-Kiraam and
Awliyah-e-Izaam?
4. On page 95 of Siraat-e-Mustaqeem
under the verse:
(ظُلُمٰتٌم بَعْضُھَا
فَوْقَ بَعْضٍ ط)
‘Some (types) of darkness is deeper
than the other’
(In other words, some sinful actions
are worse than others) He then says, ‘It is better to think of sexual
intercourse with your wife than thinking of adultery. Similarly, it is better
to engross yourself in the thought of your ox or donkey, rather than thinking
of your Peer (Murshid) or any other pious person, even though it maybe the Prophet
صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم .’
Dear Brothers! This is the statement
of the leader of the Wahabis regarding Huzoor صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم. Any person with even the least bit of
Imaan in his heart, which is even less than a mustard seed will be able to see this
and will definitely acknowledge that there is blasphemy in it.
5. It is on page 10 of Taqwiyatul
Imaan that, ‘To increase or decrease ones sustenance, to bless with good or bad
health, to give one respect, to fulfil ones desires, to get rid of evils and
calamities and to remove one from hardships is only under the authority of
Allah. No Prophet, Awliyah, devilish creature or fairy has any authority in this
regard.’ Anyone who calls out to anyone other than Allah in time of need is a
mushrik, even if he feels that the one whom he is calling out to, is able to
assist him by himself or through the Will of Allah. It is shirk (polytheism)
either way.’
Almighty Allah says in the Holy
Qur’an:
(اَغْنٰہُمُ اللہُ وَرَسُوۡلُہٗ مِنۡ
فَضْلِہٖ ۚ )
“Allah and His Rasool enriched them
with His bounties” [Surah 9, Verse74]
Here, the Holy Qur’an is announcing
that the Prophet صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
has blessed people to be enriched
with wealth, whereas the author of the corrupt book says that one who believes
anyone to have such authority over such things is a mushrik, so according to
him the Holy Qur’an is propagating polytheism.
The Holy Qur’an announces:
(وَتُبْرِیُٔ الۡاَکْمَہَ
وَالۡاَبْرَصَ بِاِذْنِیۡ ۚ )
(O Esa!) “And you cure the those
born blind, and the leper by My Command”
[Surah 5, Verse 110]
Referring to Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام, it is mentioned
as follows in another verse of the Holy Qur’an:
( وَاُبْرِیُٔ
الۡاَکْمَہَ وَالۡاَبْرَصَ وَاُحۡیِ الْمَوْتٰی بِاِذْنِ اللہِ ۚ )
“And I cure those born blind, and
the leper; and I bring the dead back to life through the Command (permission)
of Allah.” [Surah 3, Verse 49]
This is the injunction of the Qur’an
and yet the Wahabis say that none other can give good health (with or without the
command of Allah). They claim that anyone who believes that someone has been given
any such authority is a polytheist. Almighty Allah has mentioned this kind of
authority for Hazrat Esa علیہ السلام,
so the Wahabis must now say what declaration is there in this regard. According
to them, even if this authority is afforded to him by Allah عزوجل, it is still polytheism
and thus I cannot understand what their definition of Islam is.
6. On page 11 of Taqwiyatul Imaan, a
saying of the Prophet صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
is quoted wherein it is said,
‘Respect this jungle for it is in the (sacred Haram) and do not hunt any
animals therein and do not fell the trees in its boundary for it is a place
sacred for worshipping Allah.’ After quoting this narration, he says, ‘To show
respect to the jungles around the houses of Prophets or ghosts is shirk, even
though one thinks that he is worthy of respect or to think that Allah will be pleased
by you affording them respect is also shirk (polytheism).’ There are numerous
Ahadith which prove that the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم said,‘Ibrahim made Makkah the Haram and I have made Madinah a
Haram, therefore do not cut down the Acacia trees and do not hunt the wild
animals in its vicinity.’
Dear Muslim Brothers (and Sisters)! Look
with the eyes of Imaan and see how this mischievous author has distorted the
facts? He has levelled such a terrible accusation against the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم .
7. On page 8 of Taqwiyatul Imaan,
its author says that even the idol worshippers in the time of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم did
not equate their idols to Allah. What they really did was that they called out
to them in their times of need and they made offerings to them expecting to attain
some favour. He then says that it is for this reason that anyone who considers
any servant of Allah as an intercessor or a mediator between Allah and the
servants is equal in shirk to Abu Jahl[1].
What he is really saying is that if anyone accepts and believes that the beloved
Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم is our mediator and intercessor in
the Court of Allah then (Allah Forbid), such a person is a polytheist similar
to Abu Jahl.
8. In the same book, he says that if
one is asked about how many leaves are on a tree, or how many stars etc. are in
the sky, then one should not say that Allah and His Rasool صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم know
because only Allah has the knowledge of the unseen (Ilm-e-Ghaib) and not the
Holy Prophet صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم.
9. On page 7 of Taqwiyatul Imaan he
says, ‘Allah Saaheb has not afforded anyone the power to ordain anything.’ In
other words he is saying that Almighty Allah has not given anyone on earth the
power to cause anything to happen.
This clearly refutes the miracles of
the Prophets and the Karaamat of the Awliyah Allah. Almighty Allah says:
(فَالْمُدَبِّرٰتِ
اَمْرًا ۘ﴿۵﴾ )
“Then plan to accomplish the commands (of Allah)”
[Surah 79, Verse 5]
Is the author not explicitly refuting
the above mentioned verse of the Holy Qur’an?
10. On page 22 of Taqwiyatul Imaan,
it is said that anyone who’s name is Muhammad or Ali has no power or right over
anything. This is very astonishing because the Wahabis too have a right over their
belongings and yet they say that Hazrat Muhammad صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم who is the most beloved to Allah has
no power or right over anything.
11. One of their corrupt beliefs is
that Almighty Allah has the ability to lie (Allah forbid). One of their leaders
has given a decree that Waqu-e-Kizb means pardon for all those who referred to
Allah as a liar and such people can no longer be condemned. This is such a
blasphemous decree. He says that even though someone calls Allah a liar, they
should be pardoned and still regarded as Muslims. I cannot understand what they
really regard as Allah.
12. They also refute the fact that
the Prophet صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
is Khaatamun Nabiyeen (The Final
Messenger). To deny that Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم is
the Final Messenger is clear infidelity without any doubt.
13. Hence, it is on page 2 of Tahzeerun
Naas, the view of the ordinary people regarding the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم being
Khaatamun Nabiyeen, is in the sense that he is the Final Messenger in the lengthy
chain of Prophets. However, the well informed (knowledgeable) people definitely
know that being Khaatamun Nabiyeen has no untouchable seal to it. It only shows
the end of an era. It does not in any way show or determines a special level of
excellence or elevation.
If one goes by this view, then the
divine mention of this verse will be regarded in its true context:
(وَلٰکِنۡ رَّسُوۡلَ
اللہِ وَ خَاتَمَ النَّبِیّٖنَ ؕ)
“But indeed, he is the Prophet of Allah and the seal of
the Prophets”
[Surah 33, Verse 40]
Here the malicious author has tried
to establish that Khaatamun Nabiyeen only denotes the end of an era. He says
that it has no significance with the pious people, as they know that it is not
a unique station.
The author here has attempted to refute
the words of the Prophet صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
who himself has explained it to mean
final Messenger. This is a unique attribute which has been blessed to him by
Almighty Allah. This is evident from numerous Ahadith. However, the author out
of his lack of consideration has tried to identify the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم with
the common people and has omitted him from the category of the men of knowledge
and wisdom.
It is on page 16 of the same book that
even if it is assumed that another Nabi had to appear in his era or thereafter,
it will not in any way negate the finality of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم.
He further says that even if one
assumes that if another Nabi had to come on this earth or in some other domain,
it will still not interfere with the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم being
the final Messenger.
The ruling in regards to the corrupt
beliefs of the author is evident from the decrees mentioned in ‘Husaam ul
Haramain’ as decreed by the then great and learned Ulama of Haramain Sharifain.
Even he has mentioned on page 46 of his book, regarding the condition of his Islam
being names sake.
Allah protect us from those who are
only Muslim by name. On page 5 of the same book, it has been mentioned that:
The fact that the Ambia علیہم السلام
are superior to their Ummah is only in
(the context) of knowledge. As for the issue of deeds (actions), then in this the
Ummati occasionally appear to be equal and sometimes even supersede the
Prophets. The author of this book has also tried to establish that the Nabuiwat
of the Prophet صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
is Qadeem whilst the Nabuiwat of the
other Ambia علیہم السلام
is Haadith. He states on page 7 of
his book that the distinction between
Qadeem Nabuiwat and Haadith Nabuiwat, despite the union of characteristics can
only then be properly applicable. Is there really anything else with the
exception of the Zaat (Divine Self) of Allah and His Sifaat (Divine Attributes)
that are Qadeem (uncreated)?
It must be noted that Nabuiwat is a
quality and it is impossible for the quality to exist without the one that it
represents. (In view of his statement) If the Nabuiwat of Huzoor صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم is Qadeem, i.e. uncreated, then it
would necessarily mean that Huzoor صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم is
also not Haadith (creation), and thereby would mean that Huzoor صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم is Azali (meaning he always existed
and is uncreated), and according to the consensus of the Muslims, it is regarded
as kufr to believe in anything else except Allah and His Divine Attributes to
be Qadeem.
14. One of the characteristics of
the followers of the Wahabi sect is that they attempt to invalidate and falsify
everything that reflects the excellence and purity of those who have been
afforded special closeness and the special favour of Allah.
They are bent on finding faults and
shortcomings that can prove to be an effective tool in their hands to defame
and condemn the men of true knowledge. They even refute the knowledge of the
unseen which has been bestowed upon the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم.
It is on page 51 of
Barahin-e-Qaatiya that the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم does
not even have knowledge of that which is behind a wall. The author quotes this
and then falsely attributes this statement to Shaykh Abdul Haq Muhadith Dehlwi رحمۃ اﷲ علیہ.
He further mentions that the vast
knowledge of shaitaan and the Angel of death are evident from the Qur’an and
there is no such source that authenticates the vastness of the Prophet’s صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم knowledge. He thus claims that to accept such
knowledge for the Prophet
صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
without evidence is shirk. The
author of this book is prepared to give preference to the knowledge of shaitaan
over the knowledge of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی
علیہ وسلم .
He accepts it for shaitaan but says
that it amounts to polytheism if accepted for the Holy Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم.
In other words, he has actually associated
shaitaan as a partner to Allah, and he believes that this is established from
Qur’an and Hadith. Undoubtedly, these servants of the shaitaan have no qualms in
making shaitaan a partner to the Almighty.
Every Muslim should look with the
eyes of Imaan, how the author has tried to establish that the knowledge of shaitaan
the cursed is more than the knowledge possessed by Holy Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم.
Has he not really regarded it as being
more and has he not really associated shaitaan as a partner to Allah?
He has definitely accepted this and not
only has he accepted it but he has also tried to establish it as being true
from Qur’an.
All 3 of these beliefs are
undoubtedly kufr and there is no doubt that the one acknowledging it is an infidel.
Which Muslim is there that can doubt the infidelity of such a person?
15. In another book, Hifz ul Imaan,
its author Ashraf Ali Thanvi says on page 7, that if knowledge of the unseen
which is possessed by the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی
علیہ وسلم is partial then there is no uniqueness in this, since all
insane people, little children and animals possess such knowledge. Dear
Brothers, Think for a moment about what he has said. He has no conscious and
does not feel any remorse in equating the knowledge of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم to that of children, insane people
and animals. Can any Muslim still have doubt in the author of Hifz ul Imaan and
his followers being disbelievers?
16. A common practice of the Wahabis
is to shun the practices of the Muslims by branding these practices as shirk,
whereas they have been permitted by Allah and His Rasool صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم .
They brand Meelad Shareef, Standing
for Salaam, Esaal-e-Sawaab, visiting the graves of the Awliyah and the Blessed
Grave of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم , making
Faateha and 40 days etc. as shirk.
It is in the book Barahin-e-Qaatiya
that the repeated hosting of the Meelad of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم is
similar to the Hindus who repeatedly host the prayer of ‘Kanhaya’ (a Hindu
deity) and to the Shias who repeatedly observe the day of martyrdom at Karbala.
Allah Forbid! They have equated the Commemoration and Remembrance of the Birth
of the Beloved Rasool صلی
اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم
to the celebration hosted by
unbelievers in remembrance of their false deity.
They have even surpassed such nations.
They are allowed to do as they wish in any fixed and appointed time, and there
is no stipulation in this regard for them. They formulate these false obscenities
whenever they feel like.
Translator’s Note: Look at how these
Wahabis have branded Muslims to be worse than Hindus and Shias, just because
they commemorate the Birth of the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی
علیہ وسلم and remember the Awliyah and convey blessings to their deceased.
Their beliefs have no bearing to
Islam. They charge others with kufr and shirk for many things, yet when they
have any such stipulations; it is not regarded as kufr and shirk.
This is hypocrisy of the highest degree.
Beloved Muslim Brothers! That which has been mentioned above is only a few of
the heretic beliefs of the Wahabis. There are numerous other corrupt and blasphemous
beliefs of the Wahabis which show there enmity to the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم in
many of their other books.
We beseech Allah to protect us from
them and from all the other corrupt and deviant sects. Aameen.
[1]
This, statement, not only condemns the intercession of
the Prophet صلی اللہ تعالی علیہ وسلم but it also condemns all the companions, the Great Imams,
the Awliyah Allah and all the Muslims as mushriks like Abu Jahl. (Allah
Forbid).
0 comments:
Post a Comment