Sunday, 7 September 2014

Bahaar-e-Shariat Volume 4 Blog Page 20

Laws of Jurisprudence

Law: Shar’an (In the light of the Shariah) a Musafir refers to a person who has left his residential area with the intention to journey for a distance of 3 days. [Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.732/733]
Law: A day (here) refers to the shortest day in the year, and a distance of 3 days does not mean travelling from morning until evening, because there is always a need (to stop) to eat and drink, for Namaaz and other necessities, so what it actually refers to is the greater portion (of the day). For example, if he travelled from the commencement of Subho Saadiq until after noon and then he stopped (to rest etc.), then on the second and third days he did the same, then the distance of his journey will be regarded as the ‘Masaafat-e-Safr’ (Distance of the Journey). To travel until after noon also does not mean that he should have been travelling continuously, but he may also take habitually (naturally) the amount of rest and breaks that are needed during such a journey, and travelling (walking) means to travel at a moderate pace (or speed), meaning (he is) neither travelling too fast nor too slow. On dry land (desert etc.), credibility is given to the moderate pace and speed of a human and camel (etc.), and in mountainous terrain it is as per the conditions that are suitable (on such terrain). When travelling by sea, it will be based on the speed of the ship at a time when neither the wind is at a standstill nor is it blowing to fast. [Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.734/735; Alamgiri vol.1 pg.138]
Law: The short day is regarded reliable in a place where the day and night are ‘Mu’tadil’ (balanced). In other words, the greater portion of the day can be used to travel towards ones destination. Hence, the cities which have very short days, such as Bulgar, which has very short days, then in such places it does not depend on the (length) of the day. [Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.134]
Law: The ‘kos’ (league/distance of measure) is also not given any credence, because in some places the (measure) of the ‘kos’ is shorter and at other places it is longer. Actually, credence is given to ‘Three Manzils’, and on land this is based on the calculation by miles and the distance for this is 57 1/2 miles. [Fatawa Razviyah]
Law: If there are two roads leading to a place and the distance of one road qualifies for the distance of a Journey (i.e. causing one to become Musafir) and the other does not, then in this case it will be based upon the road on which the traveller takes. If he goes from the road which is nearby (i.e. the shorter road), then he will not be a Musafir and if he goes from the longer route, then he will be a Musafir, even if he does not have any valid or good reason for using this route. [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.138; Durr-e-Mukhtar, Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.738]
Law: If there, are two routes to go somewhere, or if one is by sea and the other is by land, and one is a two-day journey and the other is a three-day journey (to one’s destination). If he uses the one which is a three day journey, he is a Musafir, otherwise he is not. [Durr-e-Mukhtar; Alamgiri vol.1 pg.138]
Law: If by way of his Karaamat, a Wali (beloved of Allah) completed a three day journey in a very short space of time, then that which is evident indicates that the rules of Musafir will be applicable to him, but Imam Ibn Humaam has mentioned that it is questionable for him to be regarded a Musafir. [Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.735]
Law: The mere intention of a journey will not qualify one as a Musafir, but the rule of Musafir will only be applicable to him when he leaves the populated area of the locality. In other words, if he is in a city then (it will apply when) he leaves the city and if he is in a village then it will (apply when) he leaves the village. For the one living in a city, it is also necessary that he should also come out of the populated (residential) areas on the outskirts of the city, which are bordering (attached) to the city. [Durr-e-Mukhtar, Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.733]
Law: The villages which are bordering (attached) to the ‘Fina-e-Shahr’, then for those in the villages it is not necessary to come out of such a village as well. Similarly, if there is a field (orchard) etc. that is bordering (attached) to the city or town, and even though those who take care of it and work in it, live in it, it is not necessary to come out of these Orchards. [Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.732]
Law: The place which is outside the Fina-e-Shahr but is for the work of the City, such as the Cemetery, Race Course, Dump site etc., if these are bordering (adjoined) to the city, then it is necessary to come out of these. However, if there is a distance between the city and the Fina, then there is no need to come out of it. [Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.732]
Law: Coming out of the populated area means that the populated areas should end in the (direction) towards which he is travelling, even though in the vicinity of that area the populated areas have not ended on another side. [Ghuniya]
Law: If any ‘Mohalla’ (area) was attached to the city, but now it has become separate, then to come out of this is also necessary. If there is a Mohalla, which has become deserted (vacant), even though it was initially attached to the city, or even if it is still attached to the city, then to exit it is not a condition. [Ghuniya; Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.733]
Law: If a Station (railway etc.) is outside the populated (residential area), then on reaching the station he will be regarded as a Musafir, on condition he has intention of travelling to a destination that is regarded the Masaafat-e-Safr.
Law: For a ‘Safar’ (journey that qualifies one as a Musafir) it is also necessary, that one should intend to travel a distance of 3 days from the place from where he is departing. If he left with the intention to travel a distance of 2 days and on reaching there, he made an intention to travel to some other place, and that too is a journey which is less than 3 days in distance, and similarly if he travels the entire world in this way, he will not be regarded a Musafir. [Ghuniya; Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.733]
Law: It is also conditional that he should have the intention of travelling continuously (i.e. consistently) on a journey of 3 days. If hemade intention that he will travel for a journey of 2 days and on reaching there he will do some work there and then he will travel a journey of 1 days distance, then this is not regarded as a consistent journey of 3 days, and he will thus not be considered a Musafir. [Fatawa Razvia]
Law: It is Waajib upon the Musafir to perform Qasr Namaaz (Shorten the Namaaz). In other words, he should perform the Four (4) Raka’ats Fard Namaaz as two (2) Raka’ats. For him (the Musafir), these 2 Raka’ats are regarded as the complete Namaaz. If he intentionally performed Four (instead of 2) but sat for Qaada at 2 Raka’ats, the Fard will be discharged and the last 2 Raka’ats will be counted as Nafil, but he will be regarded sinful for this and is deserving the torment of hellfire, because he (intentionally) left out a Waajib, hence he should repent for this. If he did not sit for Qaada at two Raka’ats, then in this case the Fard is not fulfilled, and it has become Nafil. However, if he had made the intention of Iqaamat (Residency) before the Sajdah of the 3rd Raka’at, then in this case the Fard will not be annulled, but he will have to repeat the Qiyaam and the Ruku. If he made the intention in the Sajdah of the 3rd Raka’at, then now the Fard has been lost. Similarly, if he does not recite the Qir’at in the first 2 Raka’ats or in one of those 2 Raka’ats, the Namaaz is annulled. [Hidaya; Alamgiri vol.1 pg.139; Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.735/739/740]
Law: This ‘Rukhsat’ (permission) is specifically and only for a Musafir. This applies whether his journey is meant for a permissible or impermissible reason. Either way, the rules which apply to a Musafir will apply to him. [Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.736]
Law: If an unbeliever left with the intention of journeying for a distance of 3 days, and after 2 days he became a Muslim, then there is Qasr Namaaz for him. If a Na-Baaligh left with the intention of a 3 day journey and he became Baaligh on the way, if the place to which he is journeying to, from where he is, is not a distance of 3 days, he will perform the full Namaaz. If a female who was menstruating became cleansed and the place to where she is journeying is not a 3 day distance away from where she is, then in this case she will perform the full Namaaz. [Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.742]
Law: If the Muslim Ruler (Badshah) travelled the kingdom (Country) in order to assess the condition of the citizens, he will not perform Qasr, unless his initial intention was not of a journey of 3 Manzils continuously. If he travels for any other reason, and it consists of the distance of a journey, then he will perform Qasr. [Durr-e-Mukhtar, Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.746]
Law: There is no Qasr (Shortening) of the Sunnats, but this should be read in full. However, it is excused in the case of fear (i.e. danger) or when there is no time left. It must be read at a place of safety. [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.139]
Law: A Musafir is regarded as a Musafir until such time that he does not enter his locality (i.e. town, city, village etc), or if he does not intend to stay in any populated area for a full 15 days. This is in the case if he has already travelled a journey of 3 days (to reach that place). If before reaching (the distance of) 3 Manzils, he makes intention of returning, then he is not a Musafir, even though he maybe in a jungle (i.e. unpopulated area). [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.139; Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.736/737]
Law: For the Niyyat of Iqaamat (Residence) to be proper (valid), there are six (6) conditions:
1. He should stop his travelling. If whilst travelling he made the intention of residence, he will not be regarded as a Muqeem (resident/non-Musafir).
2. The place (at which he intends to reside) should be suitable for residence. If he made intention of residence in a jungle, or at sea, or in an unpopulated (uninhabited) Island, he will not be regarded as a Muqeem.
3. He intends to stay (at one place) for 15 days. If he intends to stay for less than this he will not be regarded as a Muqeem.
4. This Niyyat should be for staying at one particular place. If he intends to stay for 15 days in 2 different villages (settlements). In other words, he wishes to stay at one place for 10 days and at the other for 5 days, then he will not be regarded a Muqeem.
5. His intention should be independent. It should not be dependent on someone else.
6. His condition should not be contrary to his intention. [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.139; Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.739]
Law: If a Musafir is travelling and he has not as yet reached the city or village and he made the intention of residence, he will not be regarded as a Muqeem. If he made the intention after he reached (the city or village), he will be regarded as a Muqeem, even though he is still in search of the house etc. (which is his final stop). [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.139]
Law: If the Muslim Army halts or encamps in a jungle and they set up camp, pitch tents etc. there and make the intention of staying there for 15 days, they will not be regarded as being Muqeem. However, if those who live in a jungle set up tents (etc.) in the jungle and intend to stay there for 15 days, they will become Muqeem. The condition for this is that there should be water and grass (vegetation) available there, because the jungle is to them, like a city or village is to us. [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.139]
Law: If one intends to stay at 2 places for 15 days and both are independent, such as in the case of Makkah and Mina, then in this case he will not be regarded as a Muqeem. If they are dependent on one another (such a town and the Fina/outskirt of the Town), then in this case he will be regarded a Muqeem. [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.140; Durr-e-Mukhtar vol.1 pg.737]
Law: If one made an intention that I will live in these two localities (settlements) for 15 days, and I will live at one place during the day and at the other at night. In this case, if he first went to the place where he intended to stay during the day, then he has not become a Muqeem, but if he went first to the place, where he had intended to stay at night, then he will become a Muqeem. Now, if he goes from there into the next settlement, he will still be regarded as a Muqeem. [Alamgiri vol.1 pg.140; Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.737]
Law: If the Musafir is not independent in his intention, then in this case he will not be regarded a Muqeem even when he makes the intention of staying for 15 days. For example, a female whose Mahre- Mu’ajjal is not owed to her by her husband, becomes dependent on the husband and her own Niyyat does not count, and slave who is Ghayr Makatab is also dependent on his master, and the Army which gets their necessities from the Treasury or the King, as they are dependent on their leader, and the case of the worker who is dependent on the employer, and a prisoner, who is dependent on his incarcerators and that wealthy person on whom compensation is claimed, and a student who gets food etc. from his teacher, as he is dependent on the teacher, and a pious son, who is regarded a dependent of his father. The intentions of all the aforementioned are regarded as irrelevant, and in reality the intention of the ones whom they are dependent on will be given relevance. If they have made intention of Iqaamat (residence) then the Taabi’ (the one following or dependent on them) will be regarded as a Muqeem, and if they do not make intention of Iqaamat, then the Taabi’ will also be regarded as a Musafir. [Durr-e-Mukhtar, Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg. 834/845; Alamgiri vol.1 pg.141]
Law: If the Mahr-e-Mu’ajjal of a female is still owed to her, then she has the choice to hold herself back, thus in such a case she is not a Taabi’ (dependant/subordinate in this issue). Similarly, a slave who is Makatab has the right of travelling without the permission of the Maalik (Masters), thus he is also not a Taabi’, and the soldier who does not take his meals and necessities from the Badshah or Bait ul Maal is not regarded as a Taabi’. An employee who is not employed on a monthly or annual salary, but rather he receives a daily salary and has the right of terminating the ‘Ijaara’ after even 2 days, thus he too is not regarded Taabi’. If a Muslim who has been imprisoned (captured) by the enemy is aware that they will take him (with them) on a journey of 3 days (distance), he should perform Qasr and if he is not sure of what they intend, then he should try to ask them and then act accordingly. If they do not inform him of their intention (travel plan) then if he knows that the enemy are Muqeem, he should perform Namaaz in full and if he knows that they are Musafir, then he should perform the Qasr. If he is not able to even ascertain this, then for as long as a journey of 3 days is not accomplished, he should perform full Namaaz. If he was responsible for ‘Tawaan’ (a claim against him) and he was on a journey and has been caught, then in this case, if he is insolvent, he should perform Qasr. If he is solvent (financially stable) then he intends to pay (what he owes) within 15 days, or even if he has no intention, he should still perform Qasr. If his intention is that he will not be paying it, then in this case he will perform full (Namaaz). [Raddul Muhtar vol.1 pg.744/745]
 

0 comments:

Post a Comment